home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
121994
/
1219640.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1995-01-31
|
6KB
|
118 lines
<text id=94TT1769>
<title>
Dec. 19, 1994: Essay:Let Us Pray
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
Dec. 19, 1994 Uncle Scrooge
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
ESSAY, Page 84
Let Us Pray
</hdr>
<body>
<p>By Richard Brookhiser
</p>
<p> When speaker-to-be Newt Gingrich announced that one of the
priorities of the emerged Republican majority would be school
prayer, wise men shook their heads; the G.O.P. was making the
same mistake Bill Clinton had when he began his transition by
pushing for gays in the military.
</p>
<p> Bill Clinton should have been so lucky. Allowing prayer in
schools is as popular as allowing gays in the military was not.
Hardly a semester passes without some school principal or state
legislature trying to smuggle it back in, past the baleful eye
of the A.C.L.U. and its postulants on the bench. The 1962
Supreme Court decision that banished prayer from public school
classrooms is one of the most unpopular the court has handed
down, and surely the only one that unites Newt Gingrich and D.C.
mayor-elect Marion Barry.
</p>
<p> It is also one of the court's most whimsical decisions--a
policy preference of mid-20th century liberals disguised as
constitutional fundamentalism. It's a good thing the Justices
who endorsed it were not around in 1789, or they would have
ruled that the day of "public thanksgiving and prayer" that had
been proclaimed that October was an establishment of religion
too. The House of Representatives of the First Congress called
for the day of thanksgiving the day after it passed the First
Amendment, which prohibited any establishment of religion.
</p>
<p> But something may be popular and legal without being
desirable. An atheist desires public prayer no more than he
enjoys the currency and the national anthem, with their
affirmations of trust in God. Though some of the original suits
against school prayer were supported by atheists, the big
numbers against it have always come from religious Americans
suspicious of another religion's power plays: Jews fearful of
a Christian nation, and liberal Christians fearful of the same
thing.
</p>
<p> There are also conservative arguments against public
school prayer. The practical counterargument is that it would
buy time for the public school system. One of the great engines
of disenchantment with the way bureaucrats instruct children is
the religious right, for which Johnny's inability to pray and
to read are linked. Returning prayer to public schools might
deflect conservative evangelicals from the campaign against the
education establishment. Evangelists for school choice don't
want the public school system to get better; they want it to get
worse, as a prelude to getting out of it and into private
schools. To them the push for prayer is like asking the band of
the Titanic to strike up Nearer, My God, to Thee.
</p>
<p> How meaningful would the prayers be, anyway? Religious
opponents of school prayer fear petitions that would be
content-free. As Christian libertarian Doug Bandow puts it,
"Formalistic rituals teach an empty spirituality devoid of
meaning." Is there any reason to think the pedagogues who once
gave kids George Washington and the cherry tree and who now give
them Crispus Attucks and other patriots of color would do any
better at framing appeals to the Almighty?
</p>
<p> These arguments melt before the case for school prayer,
which is historical and political. The Founders knew that
religion should be left to believers. They invoked God not to
instruct Americans about theology, but to remind them about the
nature of liberty.
</p>
<p> The first Thanksgiving Proclamation, issued by President
Washington, asserts that "it is the duty of all Nations to
acknowledge the providence of Almighty God." The U.S., however,
had special reasons to be thankful: "for the signal and manifold
mercies...in the course and conclusion of the late war"; "for
the peaceable and rational manner in which we have been enabled
to establish constitutions"; and "for the civil and religious
liberty with which we are blessed." Men fight and plan for
liberty, but they do not decree it. God does that. The
Thanksgiving Proclamation echoed, in workaday language, the
assertion of the Declaration of Independence that rights are the
Creator's endowment.
</p>
<p> Men have imagined other sources for their rights besides
the Almighty. The Declaration mentions "the Laws of Nature."
But it immediately adds, "...and of Nature's God." Wisely so.
The past 200 years have shown that nature is a distressingly
malleable concept. It is a philosopher's parlor trick to
collapse it into history (nature in time) or will (nature in
us). When such philosophies seeped into politics, they spawned
communism and Nazism. It is also true that God--and various
gods--has covered a multitude of political sins over the
millenni. But in the modern world, rights fare best when they
are derived from a Source men fear to tamper with.
</p>
<p> Will it do little hellions any good to be exposed to such
sentiments in homeroom? Maybe not. Congress begins each day with
a prayer, and look how it behaves. But a society should know
where the things it holds dear come from, and why there are
limits to its own actions. School is one place to learn such
things, and one way of learning is to repeat the lesson daily.
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>